2017年5月28日 · The point is that EPR never measured A's photon at 45°. If A had measured at 45° instead of 0° there is no guarantee they would both get -1, that experiment was not carried out. The assumption of CFD is what allows Bell's inequality to be proved, without it there is no Bell's inequality and no EPR paradox.

2017年1月6日 · The EPR paradox, also known as the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox, is a thought experiment that was proposed by Albert Einstein, Boris Podolsky, and Nathan Rosen in 1935. It challenges the principles of quantum mechanics by suggesting that two particles can be connected in a way that allows them to influence each other's properties ...

2020年10月30日 · The EPR paradox, also known as the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox, is a thought experiment proposed by Albert Einstein, Boris Podolsky, and Nathan Rosen in 1935. It challenges the principles of quantum mechanics by suggesting that two particles can be connected in such a way that the measurement of one particle can instantly affect the state ...

2017年4月4日 · I'm reading the paper of the EPR paradox and I'm confused in the meaning of this: "The elements of the physical reality cannot be determined by a priori... Insights Blog -- Browse All Articles -- Physics Articles Physics Tutorials Physics Guides Physics FAQ Math Articles Math Tutorials Math Guides Math FAQ Education Articles Education Guides ...

2012年6月12日 · Epr Epr paradox Locality Paradox Qm In summary, the EPR paradox is a thought experiment that challenges the principles of quantum mechanics and locality. It was proposed by Albert Einstein, Boris Podolsky, and Nathan Rosen in 1935 to demonstrate the incompleteness of quantum mechanics in describing physical reality.

2014年2月7日 · The epr paradox is usually explained as something like: Suppose you have two electrons in the singlet state (+=spin up, -=spin down): lψ>= l+>l-> - l->l+> Now if you measure the spin on the first electron the explanation is (I think) that this collapses one electron onto l+> or l-> such that the wave function becomes: lψ>= l+>l-> (for ...

2016年6月16日 · “ The 'quantum non-local connection' of the EPR paradox seems to offer us a spinhole (spatial interconnecting wormhole), with slope zero to explain entanglement. So, it's not just outsiders who envision the utility of a "tiny wormholes" model.

2022年7月2日 · In summary, the EPR paradox involves two entangled particles A and B with incompatible properties, where measuring one particle affects the other even at a distance. However, this thought experiment does not allow for faster-than-light communication, as the entanglement disappears after each measurement and each pair of particles is independent.

2010年9月9日 · Now, in the EPR experiment, we have two particles instead of one. Since [P 1 + P 2 , X 1 - X 2 ] = 0, situations can be arranged where both X 1 - X 2 and P 1 + P 2 are meaningful. Now, a measurement of X 1 will fix X 2 , and a measurement of P 1 will fix P 2 , but such measurements demand mutually exclusive experimental arrangements since X 1 ...

2005年5月9日 · Sure, there have been several recent experiments and discoveries related to the EPR paradox in the last 10 years. Here are a few examples: 1. As you mentioned, physicist Alain Aspect conducted a groundbreaking experiment in 2015 that provided strong evidence for the reality of quantum entanglement and the non-local nature of the EPR paradox. 2.