![](/rp/kFAqShRrnkQMbH6NYLBYoJ3lq9s.png)
SLS vs Saturn V, SLS sucks ? : r/nasa - Reddit
SLS vs Saturn V, SLS sucks ? Question How is it possible that Saturn V had double if not the same payload to the moon and it went further as a standalone rocket than the SLS, but it gets worse… how come Saturn V could do it but SLS will need approx. 16 Starships plus Artemis III will actually be 2 SLS launches.
Saturn V VS SLS - Kerbal Space Program Forums
2015年9月5日 · The Saturn V was designed to be the best rocket that NASA could construct at the time, while the SLS seems to me to be US senators desperately trying to keep the shuttle industry alive and forcing NASA to use components for tasks that they were never designed for. Saturn V all the way for me.
Size comparison: NASA Saturn V (#92176) and NASA Artemis SLS …
2024年5月2日 · Jonathan McDowell (@planet4589) on X: “Space-Track have cataloged objects from the Mar 19 Starlink launch and it is now confirmed that two secret satellites were aboard, USA 350 and USA 351 (presumed Starshield sats) that are cataloged as 2024-050W and X (59274 and 59275).”
Saturn V compared to SLS : r/SpaceLaunchSystem - Reddit
2020年2月27日 · First off no, not for SLS (that would be TLI capacity) And second, he asked about power, Wich is entirely unrelated to capacity. The N-1 got 11.2 million lbs of thrust at liftoff Wich was way more powerful than the Saturn V, but couldn’t put nearly as much into orbit. (95 tons vs 140 tons)
Drew a comparison between Starship, New Glenn, and Saturn V
2019年2月21日 · Building a fully reusable rocket larger than the Saturn V is a major undertaking. OTOH even if they fail completely at the reusability side of things, it would still be offering better performance and cost then the SLS. So for that reason I can't understand skepticism from NASA.
Size comparison of Falcon Heavy vs Saturn V : r/space - Reddit
2018年1月7日 · The Saturn V's F-1 engines were only 263 seconds at sea level and 304 in vacuum, significantly worse than Merlin. The second stage however, used J-2 engines with a vacuum specific impulse of 421 seconds, much better than the vacuum optimized Merlin.
SLS 1st stage Vs. Saturn V 1st stage. - Science & Spaceflight
2013年11月29日 · Now, I have been deciding whether an upgraded Saturn V 1st stage would be better than an SLS 1st stage. The info for the stages so you don’t have to look it up SLS:Gross Mass- 979.452 KgDry Mass- 85.270 KgThrust(SL)- 7,440 kNISP Sea Lvl.- 363 seconds (Data is for the Block 1 SLS)Saturn V:G...
Development Cost of Saturn V & SLS Infographic - Reddit
2020年1月19日 · The total 1960-73 cost for Saturn V was $99B and was launched 13 times giving the Saturn V a $7.6B per launch. The SLS total dev so far has been $22.2B and looks to continue to get $2.13B per year, at a pace of 1 launch per year the SLS will become cheaper total/launch than the Saturn V in 4 launches
A sense of scale for the SLS as it is now the tallest Rocket ... - Reddit
2022年8月21日 · SLS is listed for its translunar injection payload, but the Saturn 5 is listed for its LEO payload Nah. Every other rocket is listed with its payload to LEO. Block 1 can put 95 000 kg into LEO. Block 2's payload to LEO is 130 000 kg. Saturn V could put 140 000 kg into LEO, but could put 'only' 43 500 kg into TLI. (all numbers according to ...
Comparison: Starship - Saturn V - SLS : r/SpaceXLounge - Reddit
2021年5月14日 · Blueprint comparison of the past and future of lunar rockets (and Mars!). All of them are superheavy lift launch vehicles:Starship, Saturn V and SLS. The poster includes external layout of the rockes, cutaways, stages, measurements an some relevant components. I put a lot of effort into making these posters, any suggestion is welcome.